Christian Witness, Perspective

Nostra Aetate – Blowing Away the Cross

I was scanning the front page of the Evangelist, the official newspaper of the Albany Roman Catholic Diocese and was struck by the picture found there.

The picture featured a group of Buddhist monks creating a mandala – an ‘artwork’ made of grains of sand individually placed. These works are very intricate and once they are completed and viewed they are blown away, ‘dust in the wind’ so to speak. The creation and destruction of the mandala are supposed to represent the Buddhist concept that “the world is an impermanent place.”

OK, so they have their mandala. The irony of the whole thing was that the mandala was in the shape of a Jerusalem Cross. In addition it was being created in the chapel of the Doane-Stuart School, a joint Roman Catholic – Episcopal private school (that has a Buddhist meditation center in it).

I thought, wow, the Buddhists get it. Symbols – what many Roman Catholics and Episcopalians have forgotten. Symbols stand for something and invoke meaning. The Buddhists got it. In the middle of an institution founded in the name of two great Christian faith traditions they created and blew away the Cross.

In today’s Times Union, the Inter-religious Affairs Coordinator of Albany’s Roman Catholic Diocese noted this event in his Religion Page ‘Voices of Faith‘ article on Nostra Aetate’s 40th Anniversary.

Now Doane-Stuart is no longer a sectarian institution, has disavowed its Christian foundations, and is basically a public school with high tuition and two chapels, but never-the-less, should not the Christians there, the editorial board of the Evangelist, and the Roman Catholic Diocese’s Inter-religious Affairs coordinator have taken a bye on lauding this event. Can’t they see that by giving attention to the event they implicitly condone its message and its irony.

Nostra Aetate was indeed a pivotal document for the Roman Catholic Church. It discussed the relationship between the Roman Catholic Church and other religions (Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism). In a positive sense it set aside perceived doctrines of hatred. It stated that all humanity is created in God’s image and that each person has within him/herself the Divine calling to unity with God.

Indeed the PNCC said the same thing almost a century before Nostra Aetate in its Confession of Faith, especially in Principals 9, 10, and 12:

I BELIEVE that all peoples as children of one Father, God, are equal in themselves; that privileges arising from differences in rank, from possession of immense riches or from differences of faith, sex and race, are a great wrong, for they are a violation of the rights of man which he possess by his nature and the dignity of his divine origin, and are a barrier to the purposeful development of man.

I BELIEVE that all people have an equal right to life, happiness and those ways and means which lead to the preservation of existence, to advancement and salvation, but I also believe that all people have sacred obligations toward God, themselves, their nation, state and all of humanity.

I BELIEVE in immortality and everlasting happiness in eternity in union with God of all people, races and ages, because I believe in the Divine power of love, mercy and justice and for nothing else do I yearn, but that it may be to me according to my faith.

The Principals of the PNCC and Nostra Aetate created an environment of respect between Catholic Christians and members of other religions. What it did not create, at least in my estimation, is a license to disavow the Christian faith or to find salvation in other religions. They do not allow us to stand by as others take the stage to blow away the cross as a symbol of impermanence.

The great Christian Saints, the contemplatives and mystics, did not need labyrinths, yoga, tai-chi, a mandala, reiki, energy fields, or crystals. They had the great prayers of the Church, the Divine Office, the Rosary, and most importantly the Eucharist and the Gospels. They had Jesus Christ, the God-man within them. They spent hours, days, months, and years meditating on him long before the yogis and Buddhists were known.

The thought that the East has taught us something is a canard. Thomas Merton brought nothing back from the East that was not already present in the Church. People just had to look for it within the Deposit of Faith.

On the 40th anniversary of Nostra Aetate, let us pray that Catholic Christians renew their own self respect and stand up to proclaim the truth of Jesus Christ crucified, the everlasting symbol of our salvation. Let us also pray that we remember that Principald 9, 10, and 12 must be seen in light of Principal 7:

I BELIEVE that the Church of Christ is the true teacher of both individual man as well as of all human society, that it is a steward of Divine Graces, a guide and a light in man’s temporal pilgrimage to God and salvation; in so far as the followers and members of this Church, both lay and clerical, are united with the Divine Founder through faith and life proceeding from this faith.

Someday, in God’s good time and through His graces we will be united as one flock under one shepherd, Christ the Lord.

4 thoughts on “Nostra Aetate – Blowing Away the Cross

  1. Please do not post my name and address.

    I write to you today to make you aware of the proposed merger of three schools in my area. The merger will be a great loss to ecumenism.

    In 1975, the Saint Agnes School (Episcopal) and Kenwood Academy (Roman Catholic) joined to form the Doane Stuart School. Doane Stuart is a member of the National Association of Episcopal Schools and the Sacred Heart Network of Schools. The school shares its campus with the Kenwood Convent of the Sacred Heart.

    Unfortunately, it is impractical for the convent to care for the medical needs of its aging population within the confines of the place that the RSCJs have called home since 1852. For this reason, the campus will be sold.

    On Saturday, August 26, 2006, a front-page article in Albany’s Times Union announced, a proposed merger of the Doane Stuart School with two other area schools. If adopted, the proposal will end the ecumenical vision of the school’s founders.

    One wonders how endowments to the Saint Agnes School, Kenwood Academy or Doane Stuart can be justly turned over to the board of the proposed, new school resulting from the merger of the Albany Academy, Albany Academy for Girls, Doane Stuart. Surely, the RSCJs, the Albany Diocese and the Episcopal Diocese could find uses for the approximately $1 million in endowments-uses in line with the donors’ intentions- uses related to the religious organizations of the founders or uses related to ecumenism.

    I look forward to your reply.

  2. The commenter above provided a name and E-mail address which I have deleted at their request.

    As to the issue at hand, I am not an attorney, so I can’t really comment on the issues surrounding the establishment of trusts and endowments – at least not as an expert.

    I do have a good deal of experience in not-for-profit management. From that experience my understanding would be as follows:

    Generally trusts and endowments are overseen by trustees or a board. They are to exercise fiduciary responsibility in their dealings with the funds. They are bound to the terms of the trust document or the documents establishing the endowment.

    I would imagine that the funds would be set up saying something like: Established for the benefit of ‘Institution A’ and its successors for the purpose of ‘Doing A, B, and C’.

    That gives the board or trustees broad discretion in managing the fund – as long as the intended purpose is met – which is probably the education of youth.

    The issue of donor intent (do a Google search on donor intent) can also be raised here (and see 2003: Year in Review – Donor Intent Emerges as Hot-Button Issue from the Foundation Center).

    Not-for-profits are supposed to use donations in line with the intent of the donor. Of course donors must make their intent clear and unequivocal. If a person sends $10 to the local fire house it will be used for whatever the fire house management deems appropriate – even if the person sending the money ‘hopes’ that it will be used for new ladders. Those giving large amounts usually attach stipulations to the donation.

    The recourse is to look into the exact language of established trusts, the endowment, and specific donations to see if their terms and conditions are being followed. If not, time to lawyer-up. You could also seek the assistance of the NY State Attorney General’s Charities Bureau.

    If the specific intent is not being carried out, i.e., educating youth on the issues of ecumanism and the Christian faith, then the funds need to be set aside for that purpose – perhaps an independent organization charged with doing that thing.

    When I wrote this posting I reviewed the school’s website. As I recall, they were already a long way from what most would believe to be the core elements of Roman Catholicism and traditional Episcopalian-Anglicanism. The beliefs both Churches shared (and probably wished to engender back in the day) did not seem to be the centering point of the school’s existence. I imagine that didn’t match well with donor intent either.

    Wherever our children are involved, parents need to be in charge. We must certainly place trust in the professionals engaged in educating our children. But, when the mission of the school, or the course of educational philosophy in the school veer from the values we wish to instill in our children, we need to do the right thing. Home Schooling, another institution, or full involvement in the existing institution – knowing what your children are learning and counteracting the obvious errors in it – is our duty.

    The first question – and the only one really – is what am I seeking for my child(ren)? I threw out the comment about lawyering-up, but will this get to what is essential, what I as a parent want at the core? That is for the parents at Doane Stuart to decide, not trustees or boards of directors.

    I wish you well in your discernment of the issue.

  3. The Attorney General’s A Guide To Mergers And Consolidations Of Not-for-profit Corporations states in part:

    The Attorney General also reviews endowment and other restricted funds held by each of the constituent corporations to ensure that funds held for a particular purpose will continue to be used for the specified purpose after the merger. In instances where the continued use of funds for a specific purpose will become impossible or impracticable after the merger, the Attorney General seeks to ensure that an appropriate modification of the restriction is ordered by the court in conjunction with its approval of the merger.

    The Court can order that restricted purpose funds be re-allocated. To challenge this you would need to be an intervener in the case (I think).

Comments are closed.