Day: May 9, 2009

Poetry

May 9 – What Did You Do to Athens, Socrates? by Cyprian Kamil Norwid 

What did you do to Athens, Socrates,
That the people erected a golden statue to you,
Having first poisoned you?

What did you do to Italy, Alighieri,
That the insincere people built two graves for you,
Having first driven you out?

What did you do to Europe, Columbus,
That they dug you three graves in three places
Having first shackled you?

What did you do to your people, Camoens,
That the sexton had to cover your grave twice,
After you had starved?

What in the world are you guilty of, Kosciuszko,
That two stones in two places bear down on you,
Having first had no burial place?

What did you do to the world, Napoleon,
That you were confined to two graves after your demise,
Having first been confined?

What did you do to the people, Mickiewicz?

Translated by Walter Whipple

Coś ty Atenom zrobił, Sokratesie,
Że ci ze złota statuę lud niesie,
Otruwszy pierwéj…

Coś ty Italii zrobił, Alighiery,
Że ci dwa groby stawi lud nieszczery,
Wygnawszy pierwéj…

Coś ty, Kolumbie, zrobił Europie,
Że ci trzy groby we trzech miejscach kopie,
Okuwszy pierwéj…

Coś ty uczynił swoim, Camoensie,
Że po raz drugi grób twój grabarz trzęsie,
Zgłodziwszy pierwé j…

Coś ty, Kościuszko, zawinił na świecie,
Że dwa cię głazy we dwu stronach gniecie,
Bez miejsca pierwéj….

Coś ty uczynił światu, Napolionie,
Że cię w dwa groby zamknięto po zgonie,
Zamknąwszy pierwéj…..

Coś ty uczynił ludziom, Mickiewiczu?…
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

LifeStream

Daily Digest for May 9th

twitter (feed #4)
New blog post: Give me that mountain music http://bit.ly/q9bf9 [#]
6:25pm via Twitter
twitter (feed #4)
New blog post: The PNCC and Labor – an old/new opportunity http://bit.ly/5eP4d [#]
7:34pm via Twitter
twitter (feed #4)
New blog post: A review of Penderecki’s St Luke Passion http://bit.ly/196MHN [#]
7:41pm via Twitter
twitter (feed #4)
New blog post: Polish heritage in the Pittsburgh area http://bit.ly/U05m9 [#]
8:42pm via Twitter
twitter (feed #4)
New blog post: The Church, ecumenism, and politics on the frontier http://bit.ly/18kKCq [#]
9:06pm via Twitter
twitter (feed #4)
New blog post: One Holocaust story http://bit.ly/pKGap [#]
9:15pm via Twitter
twitter (feed #4)
New blog post: Parish events this weekend http://bit.ly/4q6pY [#]
9:26pm via Twitter
twitter (feed #4)
New blog post: Wilno, Vilna, Vilne, Wilda, Vilnia, Vilnius http://bit.ly/mOtxN [#]
9:34pm via Twitter
twitter (feed #4)
New blog post: R.I.P. Richard Pratt http://bit.ly/r3Uh1 [#]
10:26pm via Twitter
Current Events, Poland - Polish - Polonia

R.I.P. Richard Pratt

From the Herald Sun: Pratt life an achievement

RICHARD Pratt was a personality as big as the life he led in business, politics, in sport and the theatre. He had the gift of success, but he gave through his remarkable philanthropy.

There were many sides to the character of a poor Jewish immigrant who became one of Australia’s richest men and head of an international corporate empire.

Mr Pratt, who was a strong supporter of Jewish causes, died at his home at Raheen, which was the former palace of Australia’s staunchest Roman Catholic, Archbishop Daniel Mannix.

Mr Pratt was a philanthropist who did not limit his generosity to his own faith.

He gave to all and should be remembered for the work of the Pratt Foundation as much as his other achievements.

His place in the business life of the country should not be overshadowed by the charges brought against him after admitting his responsibility in a price-fixing scandal.

In any case, this evidence was found to be inadmissable and the charges dropped and it is his contribution to national life that deserves to be remembered.

The Pratt Foundation supports a range of charities as well as the arts.

The respect in which he was held was shown by those who visited him as he was dying at Raheen.

He returned his Companion of the Order of Australia and stepped down as president of the Carlton Football Club because of the court action, but he led the club’s resurgence and was visited in his last days by the club’s champions.

Richard Pratt was a man of many parts. He was a champion junior footballer at Carlton as well as an amateur boxer at Melbourne University and became a friend of world heavyweight champion Muhammad Ali, who was a guest at Raheen.

He was also an actor and singer who turned away from a career in Hollywood to build his global business empire.

The handsome young Polish immigrant was a star in London and New York of the quintessential Australian play, The Summer of the Seventeenth Doll, in which he played sugarcane cutter Johnnie Dowd…

I did a profile on him several years ago. May he rest in peace.

Perspective,

Wilno, Vilna, Vilne, Wilda, Vilnia, Vilnius

From The Economist: Vilnius — Contested city

THE choice of name for the capital of present-day Lithuania—”Wilno, Vilna, Vilne, Wilda, Vilnia or now Vilnius—”shows who you are, or were. In the 20th century alone, it has been occupied or claimed by Germany, Russia, Poland and the Soviet Union, with only brief periods of Lithuanian autonomy.

Vilne, in Yiddish, was home to one of Judaism’s greatest rabbis, a saintly brainbox known as the Gaon (Genius) who gave his first sermon aged seven and kick-started the great Jewish intellectual revival in the 18th century. —Vilna is not simply a city, it is an idea,— said a speaker at a Yiddish conference in 1930. It was the virtual capital of what some call Yiddishland, a borderless realm of east European Jewish life and letters in the inter-war era. At times, the majority of the city’s population was Jewish. Their murder and the deportation of many Poles by Stalin meant that the city lost 90% of its population during the second world war. Present-day inhabitants of Vilnius may find much they did not know in Laimonas Briedis’s subtle and evocative book about their city’s history.

Poles mourn the loss of Wilno, one of their country’s great cultural and literary centres. Poland’s two great poets studied there: Adam Mickiewicz nearly two centuries ago, and in the pre-war years Czeslaw Milosz, a Nobel prizewinner. Yet both men saw their Lithuanian and Polish identities as complementary, not clashing.

In any of the dozen possible renderings of the city’s name, its roots evoke mystery. Wilda, its old German label, comes from the word wild. In Lithuanian come hints of the words for devil (velnias), the departed (velionis) and ghost (vele). That ambiguity is fitting. In its 700-odd years of recorded history, the city has been both capital city and provincial backwater. Outsiders have been struck by its filthy streets and shameless women, and also by its glorious architecture and heights of scholarship. Pilgrims flock to the Gates of Dawn, its most holy Catholic shrine. It has been the epitome of tolerance and a crucible of the Holocaust.

In a modern Europe Vilnius can seem peripheral. Mr Briedis, however, begins by noting that when French geographers recently plotted the mid-point between Europe’s cartographical extremes, they found the continent’s true centre was a derelict farmhouse just outside the city.

Foreign visitors have left few written accounts, but Mr Briedis uses them all as sources. A hapless papal delegation provides the first. In 1324 it tried and failed to persuade Lithuania’s great pagan ruler, Gediminas, to adopt Christianity. He showed no desire to forsake Perkunas the thunder god, berating his visitors for their intolerance. —Why do you always talk about Christian love?— he asked the pope’s men. —Where do you find so much misery, injustice, violence, sin and greed, if not among the Christians?—

Lithuania eventually adopted Christianity, along with a dynastic deal with Poland, in 1387. A cathedral was built on the pagan temple, the holy fires doused and the sacred groves felled. The Grand Duchy of Lithuania flourished. At its height in the 16th century it was a vast multiconfessional empire, stretching to the Black Sea, with no fewer than six legal languages, including Hebrew and Armenian. Even as that declined, the Vilnius style of Baroque architecture ripened in glory, a —splendid autumn— in one of Mr Briedis’s many well-turned phrases, that paid —a gracious farewell to its phantom golden age—…

Mr. Briedis’ book Vilnius: City of Strangers is available at Amazon.

Christian Witness, Poland - Polish - Polonia

One Holocaust story

Child Survives Holocaust to Tell Her Story:

ARLINGTON, Va. – For many people, stories of the Holocaust and those who lived through it are part of a history lesson. But for some, those stories are more than a history lesson —“ it’s their childhood.

As part of the national Days of Remembrance event commemorating the victims of the Holocaust, the Army National Guard recently hosted Elzbieta Straussburger, who lived through the Holocaust as a child.

Straussburger spoke of her experiences during World War II and how the war personally affected her and her family. For many in attendance, it gave a human face to the Holocaust through firsthand experiences of events that happened almost 70 years ago.

“On the first of September 1939, the Germans came,” said Straussburger, who was barely a year old at the time. “They came from the west and the Russians came from the east and in 17 days [our life] was gone.”

As a result of the invasion, her father went into the Polish army.

“He felt that he wanted to do things for his country,” she said. “He was a physician, and he knew that he would be useful.”

Straussburger and her mother wouldn’t see him again until after the war.

“We lost track of him totally … My mother was 27 when this happened. So, what does a young, 27-year-old woman with a child do? She went to her mother…”

A really excellent story that delves into the realities of life, realities that are often overlooked or misinterpreted.

Perspective, Political,

The Church, ecumenism, and politics on the frontier

From EuropeanVoice: Between the pope and the patriarch by Vitali Silitski

The public-relations plan pursued by Alyaksandr Lukashenka will make Belarus’s exclusion from the EU’s Eastern Partnership seem minor.

The launch of the Eastern Partnership in Prague on Thursday (7 May) will lack one of the characters who played a principal role in the run-up to the summit: Alyaksandr Lukashenka, the president of Belarus. His absence will please many EU foreign ministers. But nor will Lukashenka mind greatly.

Lukashenka is not used to harsh words being delivered to his face and he would probably have found too few Western leaders willing to shake hands with him for him to be able to turn the visit into a propaganda triumph.

But there is a second reason why Lukashenka will not mind greatly: he has already achieved a public-relations coup, by meeting Pope Benedict and Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi. Lukashenka’s visit to western Europe over the past 12 years have been restricted to skiing holidays and medical treatment in Austria, so the visit to Rome was a breakthrough.

It may also prove to be a breakthrough for him in domestic politics. Lukashenka’s audience with the pope went down very well with Belarus’s two million Catholics, among whom, according to independent opinion polls, opposition to Lukashenka is three times greater than it is among the country’s Orthodox majority and nearly twice as great as it is among Protestants. In other words, Lukashenka may have managed to disarm the largest bloc of opposition to him in Belarusian society.

But to view Lukashenka’s success in Rome as merely compensation for the Prague snub would be wrong. When he met the pope, Lukashenka had a far more ambitious agenda in sight: he was pursuing an opportunity to be the man to arrange a meeting between the pope and the Russian patriarch, and thereby to mend the 1,000-year-old schism between Eastern and Western Christianity.

This might sound implausible. For much of his presidency, for political and geopolitical reasons, Lukashenka has acted as a buttress for Russian Orthodoxy. He suppressed the development of the Greek Catholic (Uniate) Church from its stronghold in Ukraine, suppressed attempts to build Belarus’s own orthodox church independent from Moscow and adopted a repressive law on religion that discriminated against Protestant denominations. His championing of Orthodoxy was symbolised in 2001, when he played host to the patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church at exactly the same time that Pope John Paul II was paying a visit to Ukraine.

But Lukashenka has quietly pursued a policy of building up political capital through ecumenism since at least 2002 —“ a year in which he explicitly declared that he would like to bring the Catholic and Orthodox churches together.

But the real opportunity to pursue the strategy of ecumenism came this February when Metropolitan Kirill of Smolensk became head of the Russian Orthodox Church, replacing the traditionalist Aleksey II. Kirill is no traditionalist: he is polished yet outspoken, open to ecumenism, and PR-minded. Kirill previously served as head of the Russian Orthodox Church’s foreign-relations department. He has already met Pope Benedict, when he was a metropolitan. For many, the question now is not whether, as patriarch, he will meet Benedict, but when.Lukashenka’s entourage has rushed to explore that possibility.

In the months before Lukashenka’s visit to Rome, Lukashenka met the Catholic archbishop of Belarus and paid a surprise visit to Patriarch Kirill. Viewed in the context of Lukashenka’s strategy, it now seems clear that he was trying to secure Kirill’s (and Kremlin’s) his consent for a visit to Rome and to discuss the possibility of a meeting between Kirill and Benedict —“ and, since his return from Rome, Lukashenka has mused publicly about the pope and the patriarch meeting.

If Lukashenka manages to persuade Russia to accept a visit by Pope Benedict to Belarus —“ an offer to which the Vatican gave a measured response —“ Lukashenka would prove himself to be a master of political brinkmanship, for the Russian Orthodox Church considers Belarus to be its ‘canonical territory’. But if he manages to bring Kirill to Belarus when the pope is there, he would secure a place in a history as one of the men who ended the schism between eastern and western Christianity. That could guarantee his legitimacy for years to come, both in domestic politics and in relations with Russia.

Lukashenka’s strategy of ecumenism gives another twist to a simple fact: Lukashenka is uniquely placed to play games between the West and the East. It is nearly impossible to isolate him. Lukashenka will find his way to Europe, be it via Rome, Prague or via some other route. That is the third reason why Lukashenka will not mind not being in Prague too much.

Nonetheless, Lukashenka would, of course, like to have as many roads to Europe as possible. By blocking off the route that leads through Prague, both the Belarusian opposition and its Western supporters have therefore lost a real opportunity to force Lukashenka into a serious dialogue on human rights, to set conditions and to extract real political concessions.

Pope Benedict may now have an opportunity to make such demands of Lukashenka. Europe should strive to ensure that the pope, if he visits Minsk, speaks out about democracy and human rights as passionately as his predecessor did. Given that Lukashenka believes that now is the time to play the ecumenism card, Europe should start working on convincing Benedict immediately.