What is Unity
From the Young Fogey, Metropolitan Jonah of the OCA speaking to the ACNA Inaugural Assembly on the issue of Church Unity. More here.
What will a full ecumenical reconciliation take?
My take, the PNCC is 99.9% of the way there. While our discussions with Rome are exactly, as Met. Jonah posits, an effort at mutual understanding, discussion with OCA would have real purpose.
“My take, the PNCC is 99.9% of the way there.”
Forgive me, Deacon Jim, but I think that is too optimistic. While Metropolitan Jonah was obviously only raising the primary questions that divide the Byzantine Orthodox from the orthodox Anglicans, there are a host of secondary questions, many of which would be relevant also to the PNCC. These include, but are not limited to: married bishops; clergy who, for whatever reason (including the death of the first spouse), are twice married, as well as clergy who married after ordination, and even, clergy who are married to women who are twice married, again for whatever reason; the exclusive use of leavened bread, currently required of BO Western Rite congregations. Further, AFAIK, the PNCC is unique in including the proclamation of the Word of God among the sacraments, and there is also the question of the practice of Reconcilation within the PNCC. Like Rome, the Orthodox take a dim view of general absolution.
I would be very interested in reading more of your opinions regarding
PNCC “ecumenical reconciliation” with the Eastern Orthodox Church. Please
give some thought to covering the topic on this blog space.
Fr. Greg,
Perhaps not too optimistic, but hopeful. Certainly you are correct that there are a variety of issues that need exploration, but I think the PNCC is much closer than most think. My understanding is that previous discussions broke down, not over any of the issues commonly cited, but rather due to the PNCC’s continued membership in the Union of Utrecht. Orthodoxy saw where they were headed. Thankfully we are free of that.
Where we are close is a common understanding of the term Catholic. That plus complete agreement on all the items mentioned in Met. Jonah’s speech (proper understanding of orders, view of the Theotokos, marriage, the role of the Bishop of Rome, no filioque) would seem to make us a better match out of the gate. When you scratch the surface you will find that our theology is far more Orthodox on a host of issues which is evidenced by the fact that we ascribe fully to the Orthodox-Old Catholic Agreed Statements.
On the Word of God issue, I do not think that Orthodoxy has exactly and formally enumerated sacraments the way the West has. The West’s understanding of sacraments (who performs marriage, how is the bread and wine changed, exact counts – which are a more recent invention) spring from a sort of legalism that requires exact explanation for everything.
The OCIC writes as follows:
What a brilliant and faithful man Metropolitan Jonah is. I could listen to him for days.
It is wonderful to see a church leader putting minor differences aside to reach out to another wing of the church.
We should all pray for Jonah and his efforts!