Perspective

Our Eucharistic Need

There are many sources of information available regarding the reception of Holy Communion, the Eucharist, between the many Churches.

Many people are often confronted with a dilemma when they are in “another” church. These occasions may be based on proximity (it’s the closest church to me), moral imperative (I can no longer attend that church due to scandal), or for family reasons (we all want to attend together; we’re going to a wedding, funeral, other service).

Many Churches open the communion table to all attendees. Part of the reason for this may be their theological view of the Eucharist. ‘We’re sharing special bread/wine that is a symbol of Jesus.’ Such a sharing places the onus on the act of community and the reason for coming together. We are here as one to praise God together. The Eucharist is symbolic of our Christian action and mandate. It’s still just bread and wine albeit invoking a special representation.

For Catholic worshipers the story is different. We fully believe that the act of consecration changes the bread and wine. It is no longer bread and wine in any way except for its appearance and taste. The elements of bread and wine have been fully changed into Jesus Christ Himself. Jesus is truly present in every possible way, body, blood, soul, and divinity. He is there ready for us to receive Him. By receiving Him we are joined together not just in theory, but in reality by the action of Christ and the grace of God. When I receive I receive and am joined to my brothers and sisters throughout the world. By the Body and Blood of Christ we become the Body of Christ.

This is wonderful and mystical and the act of receiving has consequences. We are changed by God’s grace, we are joined together, we are confirmed in our Christian mission, we are nourished, and our desire to be so very close and intimately joined with Jesus Christ is increased.

In short, as the Rev. Ernest Falardeau, SSS. has said, “…it will be necessary to eliminate the idea that the Eucharist is some kind of reward for good behavior. It is the bread of life. It is a necessity.”

The Rev. Falardeau captures the key element of the Eucharist. It is the nourishment that fulfills our essential human desire – to be one with Christ and to be with Him forever. Jesus Himself advised us that the Eucharist is essential for our salvation: —Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you cannot have life in you.— (Jn 6).

God has put the desire for heaven in each of us. It is our soul’s longing to return to its origin. No matter the amount of masking today’s society attempt to do. No matter the level of covering up we engage in, the desire is there. The Eucharist allows us daily or weekly closeness to Christ.

As Catholic Christians we have two essential obligations.

The first is the Catechesis of the Eucharist. We musty teach our brothers and sisters what the Eucharist is, the mystery beyond symbolism which is the reality of Jesus Christ.

The second is the opening of the Eucharistic door to all who share in Eucharistic faith. This is commonly referred to as Eucharistic Sharing.

In our Church, the communion rail is open. What is required is proper disposition and the faith and belief that what you receive is the actual Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity of Jesus Christ under the appearance and taste of bread and wine.

Our Roman Catholic friends as well as those attending a Roman church might ask —“ what does this all mean? As a member of the Roman church you would have to look to the conditions found in the Code of Canon Law – Canon 844:2. For non Roman Catholics you would have to follow the “rules” published in the pew missal. It is all very legalistic and formal and in the end you would have to make a decision as to whether you would approach the Altar or not (all while getting quite conflicted regarding your need versus the rules).

The Canon states: “Whenever necessity requires or genuine spiritual advantage suggests, and provided that the danger of error or indifferentism is avoided, it is lawful for the faithful for whom it is physically or morally impossible to approach a Catholic minister” (Catholic meaning churches with valid Holy Orders such as the Orthodox, PNCC)

I highly recommend the article: Eucharistic Sharing: Recent Developments by Ernest Falardeau, SSS. as originally published in Ecumenical Trends, for a further exposition on this matter. See especially:

—One of the problems with the present legislation in Canon 844, and the other official documents of the Church are that initially these existing rules were interpreted very strictly. Any attempt to interpret them generously was resisted. At the present time, this is changing. The Guidelines of South Africa, India, Germany and Austria tend to interpret existing rules more broadly. The new Policy for Canada expressly recalls the general principle of Canon Law that privileges are to be interpreted broadly. And it understands Eucharistic sharing as a privilege.— (Eucharistic Sharing: Recent Developments, Ernest Falardeau, SSS., Originally published in Ecumenical Trends)

At face value, there is no clear, understandable, or easily discernable guide for anyone in approaching an understanding of Canon 844:2. Many Bishop’s conferences (setting Roman Church policies at the national level) give very broad latitude to the believer and interpret these concepts with great charity (South Africa, Canada as noted above). In the United States a very formal and legalistic view is taken.

To me, rules exist to guide people in making informed descisions. They are not meant as a roadblock to Jesus. As soon as we get away from minimalism and legalism, as soon as we stop loosing sight of our need for Jesus because we are busy interpreting a law, as soon as we stop treating the Eucharist as a personal possession that I may choose to give or withhold, and as soon as we focus on teaching Christ real and present, our road to God will open and we will be better fulfilling Christ’s direction.

Everything Else, ,

Holy Mass, Exposition, Novena, and Benediction

Another Wednesday evening service completed. The wonderful thing about our Catholic faith is that once the worship is completed we take Jesus home with us in our hearts. He is inside of us, strengthening us through the sacramental grace we receive in the Holy Eucharist.

The Church was hot, but all gets forgotten when you are before the Lord in adoration. Every Wednesday evening we offer Holy Mass followed by Exposition, a Novena to Our Lady of Czestochowa, and Benediction. People think yoga and meditation can heal all… They should spend an hour in quiet contemplation before the Blessed Sacrament. It’s not just the power of the peaceful moment, but the strength we receive from God real and present to us – physically, spiritually, eternally.

If each of us could just make time to spend an hour with the Lord each day. The power of His love and the working of His grace in our lives – if we allow it, would work wonders across the world.

Perspective, Poland - Polish - Polonia

Who stole the kiszka?

There is a very popular and funny Polka tune called —Who Stole the Kiszka—. The song was originally recorded by Polka Hall of Fame inductee Walt Solek.

A little history

Walt Solek started recording in 1939 with the Krakowska Orchestra organized by his brother Henry. After recording with them on the RCA Victor label, he organized his own band. Solek served in the U.S. Navy and after the war he re-established his band and recorded the —Julida Polka— on Columbia Records. That hit vaulted him right to the top of the Polka world. Solek’s band was booked throughout the Eastern United States, and he was billed as the —Polish Spike Jones.— When the polka business reached a low in the 1950s, his band made the switch to cutting records with English lyrics. This resulted in a new hit for him, and the perennial Polka favorite, —Who Stole the Kiszka.— During his seventy-five years as a polka musician, Solek earned the nickname —The Clown Prince of Polkas— by wearing funny costumes on stage. He also was noted for his motto: —Bringing people together through music!—

Why is this important?

Walt Solek died in April 2005 at the age of 94. He was survived by his daughter, two grandchildren, three great-grandchildren, a sister, two brothers and many nieces and nephews.

This quick review of his life shows the sort of indicators we all think about when we think of tradition. We think, Polka music —“ that’s traditional. We think, Wow a married man, children, family ties —“ that’s traditional. He served in the Navy —“ that’s traditional.

These few touch points set a sort of atmosphere that recounts for us happier times. We think of them as simple times. Time spent with family, going to church on Sunday, sitting by the radio and listening to Polka tunes on a Sunday afternoon. The family dinner. Going to bed at night while still singing —Who stole the kiszka—.

By the way —“ kiszka, polska kaszanka, for the uninitiated, is a type of sausage —“ very peasant in its origins. It’s basically made from buckwheat groats, leftover parts of pigs you wouldn’t want to think about, and blood.

A variant on the word kiszka is an informal term used to denote guts —“ kiszki (pronounced keesh-kee).

Well, somebody stole my kiszka!

What I’m speaking about is the slow trudging destruction of ethnic parishes in the R.C. church. I’ve been on the front lines of the protest against church closings, the removal of foreign language Holy Masses, and the removal of beautiful devotions and other spiritual exercises that enrich the community through prayer.

The worst situation I personally observed was the closing of Transfiguration R.C. Church in Buffalo, NY. My father was baptized in this church. In the rubble of what was left of the church I was able to see very clearly what was being done to my faith. Under the tossed about garbage and debris inside the church was the sacrifice of my parents, my grandparents and my great grandparents. There were the memorial plaques —“ this window donated by such and so, In memory of him or her. The baldachin or canopy under which the Holy Eucharist used to be carried in procession was on the floor under chunks of plaster and other garbage. In my mind’s eye I recalled the first time I saw a canopy being carried over the monstrance. I saw myself as a child and remembered gazing with wonder at the awesome respect we Catholics were showing Christ. The people fell to their knees, artists created the canopy and the magnificent monstrance in which the Body of our Lord was being carried. Mom said it was called adoration.

You might ask: Are you attached to your ancestors or to God? As a Catholic —“ both. God is the summit and the goal and we reach Him not through just our own prayer and faith commitment, but through the shared prayer and faith of the church militant and the church triumphant —“ the communion of saints.

transfig1.jpgThe sacrifice of our ancestors should not be in vain. They did not build magnificent monuments to themselves —“ but to God. Their sacrifice, their focus, their family was all about God and in praise of Him. We do not love these churches because they represent our ancestors but because they represent right ordered thinking about God. They represent a community working together to praise, worship and witness Him.

As these ethnic churches, created as masterpieces to the glory of God, from the sacrifice of our immigrant ancestors, are closed, as traditions are rethought and cast off as irrelevant, as respect for the Holy Eucharist and the beliefs of the Church wane, we need to ask, who stole our kiszka? Who is ripping out our kiszki? And why?

What I see is a slide toward a new stigmatization and subtle persecution of people. These are people like me, attached to faith, with family centered and ethnic values, and who hold that tradition is not just a longing for something long dead. These values have at their core the bulwark of the Church. The church as the center of the community is remarkably able to support and reinforce the Christian way of life. It happens in the time tested way —“ through prayer, sacrifice, and community centered action.

The press has recently highlighted the struggles of the members of St. Stanislaus Kostka Parish in St. Louis Missouri. In this particular case the struggle is between an Archbishop bent on resting singular control of $9.5 million in assets from the parishioners of the Church. The actions of Archbishop Raymond Burke, a Vatican trained Canon Lawyer, appear at face value to be legalistic, minimalistic, petty, and in direct contradiction to the actions of all previous Bishops and Archbishops of St. Louis.

Other struggles are not as well known. A quick search of the Internet will reveal the struggles that have taken place between the people of Assumption BVM Parish of Oil City, PA and the Bishop of Erie, PA., the people of St. Casimir’s in Albany, and many others. While these struggles to maintain the sacred, historical, and spiritual home of Catholic Christians are better know, the real story is closer to home. Buffalo, Detroit, Hamtramck, Chicago, Boston, Albany, large cities and small towns and the list goes on; have seen traditionally ethnic parishes close one-by-one. Of course the Bishops cite statistics and form committees that provide a veneer of credibility. They talk about fiscal problems, lack of vocations, declining census figures, and non payment of minimum diocesan assessments all as justifications for their actions.

Isn’t Tradition just old stuff ?

It depends. Some people practice traditions like they practice their faith —“ in a cold, separated sort of way. We do it because grandma did it. They never make it their own.

Like anything, tradition must be made alive by our taking ownership of it. We must make a conscientious effort to do these things because they are important to us and our children. It’s like our faith. Unless we accept Christ in faith, and invite Him into our lives, we are just going through the motions. In the same way, we must integrate tradition with our lives. Think of any traditional ethnic dinner during the holidays. At Christmas it may be Wigilia, Pronzo delta vigilia, or le reveillon dinners. How do you make it your own? Have you added your child’s favorite dish, pictures of your ancestors on the table, other meaningful objects (grandma’s crucifix or manager)? It is no longer just tradition but is alive because of your additions and modifications.

In the same way, our attachment to these churches is not just a cold, aloof, I go there because I have too faith. It is something real, meaningful, and visceral for us. It is alive, like Christ. It is felt not just in our minds and hearts, but in our guts, our kiszki.

What’s the problem…

What is the central problem and how does is represent a continuation of the repression of the Catholic faith, tradition, values, and of ethnic parishes?

The Struggle —“ Traditionalism versus Liberalism

First there is a constant struggle within the Roman Catholic Church over traditionalism versus liberalism. The American Church tends to exist in the liberal camp. While there are exceptions, the vast majority of Bishops do not care for traditionally minded Catholics who find great inspiration in beautiful liturgies and certainties of faith. The faith handed on from generation to generation via language and tradition is denigrated. It should be noted that in American circles Pope John Paul II was often viewed as a traditionalist, old-world leader —“ and as such was irrelevant.

As noted above, one of the basic tenets of Catholic faith is that faith is handed on from generation to generation. Faith starts with mom and dad in the family. There is a —Communion of Saints— and a progression of life and faith. Tradition, language, and customs are more than quaint side shows that are brought out at Christmas and Easter. These things create a continuity of faith through our ancestors, back to the Apostles. They are especially founded upon their realization within the family unit —“ and not just the nuclear or modern disconnected family —“ but in the extended, tribal family.

Per the Catholic News Service, Bishop Howard J. Hubbard of Albany called Jan. 6, 2005 for a commitment to revitalization of the parish despite the sex scandals, vocation crisis, pressures of secularism and other challenges facing the church. He stated, “We have a beloved pope who is melting away before our eyes, as a recalcitrant Curia seeks to steer the bark of Peter back to the 19th century.” Bishop Hubbard made the opening presentation to the annual Diocesan Leadership Symposium sponsored by the National Pastoral Life Center in New York.

Perhaps the Bishop should be reminded that just because something existed in the 19th century does not in and of itself make it evil. What existed in the 19th century were his grandparents and the seeds of faith that established his family. In addition, it would seem highly uncharitable to paint the Roman Curia with such a broad brush. Maybe a better approach would be found by a simple reference from the Bible: —Test all things; hold fast to the good, but abstain from every false coinage.— (1 Thess 5:21-22).

American R.C. clergy (not all) and its leadership (not all) seem to be looking forward to a revival of the new openness. Newness and openness are more important and in fact vital to them and are opposed to the old and the traditional. Those ethnics that hold on to and publicly represent tradition must be repressed.

The best way to do this is to destroy centers of tradition, divide, conquer, and integrate. The problem is that you cannot ethnically cleanse someone’s soul, spirit, and memories. But, you can do it to future generations. Our children and grandchildren will not have a connection to the past. They will only look sadly on their poor parents and grandparents who have had the wind knocked out of their sails and who have had their faith damaged. Why doesn’t grandma go to church anymore? they will ask.

What’s really sad is that the children will not pray for the dead. The dead are old news, part of a tradition that is not relevant. What is old and dead is dead. Their connection to that Corporal Work of Mercy, burying the dead, will be lost. Their connection to the communion of saints will be a one liner from the Nicene Creed.

Literal or Spiritual?

What I find most odd, especially as illustrated in the case of St. Stanislaus in St. Louis, MO is the difference between the Roman Catholic Church’s views the interpretation of scripture and how it views the interpretation of Church made laws.

The Roman Catholic Church has not purported to be literalist in terms of Biblical understanding, at least within the past hundred years. The Roman Catholic Church is founded on Scripture and (oddly enough) tradition. The Church classifies Biblical books in different, figurative, ways as stories, poetry, and mythology. Each book has a message and an interpretation, but must be viewed based upon its historical milieu and based solely on the judgment of the Church. Who was the book written for, what were the circumstances, what was the message? While the Bible is treated with such careful interpretation, re-interpretation, study, and message-crafting, the laws of the Church, namely Canon Law and the Catechism, are interpreted literally (although conceptually they should be interpreted broadly and charitably).

If this were not true it might be a funny irony. Instead it becomes a Machiavellian reality show. Legalists tend to apply the law more harshly toward others than toward themselves. The legalist concentrates on his own strengths and the weaknesses of others. He refuses to pull the plank out of his own eye before he searches for the particle in someone else’s eye.

By way of additional Biblical reference, the scribes and Pharisees were ready to stone the woman guilty of adultery (John 8:2-11), yet they were insensitive to their breach of the law by taking advantage of the helpless (Mark 12:40; cp. Jas. 1:27), the neglect of their responsibilities to their own families (Mark 7:10-13), or their persecution of the righteous (Matt. 23:29-39).

Legalism has no interest in reducing burdens or assisting those in need (even if the need would assist people on their way to heaven). Instead, this continual reliance on the codes and laws of the Church produces burdens and refuses to assist anyone upon whom they are imposed.

Jesus contrasted Himself with the scribes and Pharisees with respect to burdens:

—And they tie up heavy loads, and lay them on men’s shoulders; but they themselves are unwilling to move them with so much as a finger— (Matt. 23:4).

—Come to Me, all who are weary and heavy-laden, and I will give you rest. Take My yoke upon you, and learn from Me, for I am gentle and humble in heart; and you shall find rest for your souls. For My yoke is easy, and My load is light— (Matt. 11:28-30).

Peter criticized the Jewish Christians of his day when they sought to place the burdens of Mosaic Law on others. Peter said, —Now therefore why do you put God to the test by placing upon the neck of the disciples a yoke which neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear?— (Acts 15:10).

Perhaps treating people as people, and looking at the complexities of the human heart would serve the Church better. Unfortunately, the ethnics may be too complex and deep. Perhaps they cannot be easily herded.

Those who are attached to their ethnic parishes and their heritage are in need of a shepherd, not the shepherd’s dog. The dog acts on instinct, the shepherd acts with forethought —“ —Will I hurt the sheep if I yank them by their neck?— In St. Louis, the reliance on legalism is directly challenged by a people who fought for over a thousand years for freedom. The Polish people who emigrated for freedom, who withstood communism, fascism, and imperialism all in the cause of human freedom, are to the legalists and minimalists a threat, and must be repressed.

In the end it is a choice of focus. What is essential is that in spiritual matters we remain united. That we accept the spiritual heritage handed down to us, by Christ first and foremost, by the Fathers of the Church, and by the catholic synods of the first 1,000 years of Christianity. The enrichment of our spirits through our knowledge of Christ and His salvific sacrifice trumps mere legalism and minimalism.

Accommodation versus Absolutism

—There seemed to be a consensus among us that the best way to accommodate immigrants to the United States is to integrate them into existing parishes rather than the previous pattern of establishing national parishes.— — Bishop Howard Hubbard of Albany, NY writing on the topics discussed by New York State Bishops during their 2004 ad limina visit with Pope John Paul II.

Absolutists, dictators and such create absolute laws that serve their own purposes. It is the perpetuation of power for the sake of power. They act like the child who, when he does not get his way, picks up his toy and goes home. The Archbishop of St. Louis did exactly that. He picked up his priests and went home. He then placed a personal and interdict on the leaders of the St. Stanislaus parishioners. I would urge those reading this article to do a Google search on —interdict.—

It’s another not so funny irony that a medieval remedy is being used by those so intent on purging tradition.

When the Polish immigrants of Scranton and other U.S. cities sought Christ and their faith traditions, they were met with the same absolutism. They were met with strictures that were self serving in the perpetuation of power and class. They were met by nativist philosophies that trumped Christian love and charity. In the New York Times of August 24, 1901, James Cardinal Gibbons, prelate of the Roman Catholic Church in the United States was quoted as having said: “The country, it seems to me, is overrun with immigrants, and a word of caution should be spoken to them.”

The bishops it would seem have perpetuated this line of thinking right through today. Don’t let ethnics establish anything of theirs, integrate them.

When Bishop Francis Hodur sought a just hearing from the Vatican he was redirected. He petitioned Rome for a Polish-American bishop or Apostolic Delegate, for the suppression of “games” and “lotteries” directed by priests in the name of the Church” and for lay influence in parish affairs. He sought democracy so that his ethnics could find a clear way to God. They sought accommodation, not of evil, but of slight variances in the manner of leadership and management of the civil affairs of the Church. —Please give us someone who understands our culture and language, so we can learn more about the Catholic way to God.— —Please let us have a voice and a vote over the civil business of the Church.—

Of course this was met by excommunication.

So…

In the end we all have choices to make. How do we preserve our heritage, our traditions, and our path to God. How do we seek God in a true way, unencumbered by onerous discipline meted out by self appointed keepers of the business? I found it in the Polish National Catholic Church. It is a place where I can feel secure in faith, tradition, and identity. It is a place where no one will close my church. Best of all, it is a place where the Eucharist, the role of Mary, and the centrality of the Holy Mass keep me connected to the communion of saints.

My kiszka is safe and my kiszki are feeling fine…

Perspective

The Conflict Between Spirituality and Realism – The Christian’s Role in Secular Society

“An idealist in an age of pragmatists, a romantic in an age of realism…”

Can we use these words to describe us as Catholic Christians? These words appeared in a “San Francisco Examiner” article describing a man about to retire, a man who sought the public good. This particular man shaped his life and his work based on the example set by others and on goals and values he personally espoused.

As Christians we are called to shape our lives by the example given to us by Jesus Christ. This model, imitated throughout history by the saints, is as alive and pressing today as it has ever been. The goals and values we should be pursuing are those set by God.

When we read the Bible, God’s Word, which our Church considers a Sacrament, a means by which grace is given, we tend to think of it as a historical document. Too often it becomes a story of long ago. We fail to grasp the fact that the Gospel is a living document. More than a document it is a living fire given to guide us through the power of the Holy Spirit. How do we apply this power?

Life in today’s world is marked by our unfortunate connection to materialism. It is a materialism that is more than a desire for things. Wants and desires, an “I can have it all” attitude surely exists. It is best evidenced in our children. Ask a child the meaning of Christmas and you will be shocked by the answer. The common response is toys, Santa, gifts, food, a party, time off from school. “Why do we give and get gifts?” “To be nice.” “What if we’re not nice?” “Santa won’t be happy.” “Why do we try to be nice to each other?” “Santa.” It becomes a round robin conversation where nice is equal to Santa and Santa is the reason for the season.

If materialism were only desire we could fight it through repentance, prayer, fasting, teaching, and the traditional methods of overcoming the sin of selfishness.

Unfortunately, this is not enough. Materialism is founded in society’s ever increasing push to secularization. Secularization is at its root realism. Realism is commonly defined as ‘a concern for fact or reality and rejection of the impractical and visionary.’ If we can define it, it is. If we can produce it, it exists. If we can see, touch, smell, and taste it we can know it.

According to the Rev. Mark H. Creech, a commentator for the Christian News, “Secular humanism is that philosophy of life that emphasizes a worldview based on naturalism: the belief that the physical world is all that is real. It rejects theistic morality and supposedly defers to scientific inquiry. To a secular humanist, there is no divine purpose being worked out in the universe by Deity. Life has value and meaning only as we create and develop it. Being free from supernaturalism, the secular humanist opposes any absolute standards.”

In secular society materialism is more than simple desire; it is the way of life. This way of life has no moral basis. Life is “in the eye of the beholder.” Everything becomes subjective. Ethics, morality, law, humanity, and life itself are entirely situational and individualistic.

A good example of this trend toward secularization is the contrived distancing of “religious values” from public life.

In William Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England, Blackstone wrote: “Man, considered as a creature, must necessarily be subject to the laws of his Creator, for he is an entirely dependent being.”

This legal tradition that acted as the foundation for the United States, its Constitution, and the interpretation of our laws since 1793 is now regularly ruled to be inappropriate, improper, and not worthy of discussion. The new secularization would rather have a make-it-up as you go along basis for law. God did not create us, we are not headed toward God, and all we have is the here and now, so “do it if it feels good.”

Are our modern lifestyle, global view, and personal beliefs nothing more than pragmatism? Do we say: “If I see it, or it is proven by science, I will believe?” Do we sow the seeds of unbelief in our everyday decisions at work or in the home?

The answer for us as Christians is to be witnesses. We must join ourselves to Christ ever more closely and to take on a Christian spiritual attitude. Making THE choice and placing our complete faith and trust in Jesus Christ is exceedingly difficult. It is a giant leap-of-faith that the world does not want you or me to take. It is the exact opposite of believing in luck, the quick fix or the fast buck. When we take this chance – a chance on God —“ we immediately mark ourselves as outcasts.

Once we become regenerated we become true believers and yes, we are in but apart from the world. We recognize our position in Jesus Christ as our Savior. We can no longer compromise or “blend in” with the world. Instead, we must be in the world, declaring repentance and through repentance salvation according to God’s Word. We must actively challenge the secular world view.

St. Peter tells us that we as Christians belong to God and that belonging to God carries a responsibility. “But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people belonging to God, that you may declare the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light.” (1 Peter 2:9).

The Gospel according to St. John tells of Jesus’ prayer on the night before he died. Jesus himself states that we are not of or for the world: “I have given them your word and the world has hated them, for they are not of the world any more than I am of the world. My prayer is not that you take them out of the world but that you protect them from the evil one.” (John 17:14-15).

Nothing, including ourselves, is a being onto itself. We are part of the Body of Christ. We are required to do those things that energize us spiritually and prepare us to take on secular society. We desperately need those traditional forms of fighting sin: repentance, prayer, fasting, and the Eucharist. Above that we need to engage and witness our faith. We need to take the fruit of that repentance, prayer, fasting, and the Eucharist and engage the world. We must burn with the fire of the Gospel and with the power of the Holy Spirit. We must witness actively to our friends, family, children, neighbors, and especially to those who despise Christian faith.

“An idealist in an age of pragmatists, a romantic in an age of realism…”

Are we idealists and romantics for Christ? Can we be more than Thomas and believe not by seeing? Can we be impractical and visionary? This is what the saints did. This is what we are called to do.

Perspective

Desensitized

“One day I stood for the very first time with a knife in my hand beside a naked corpse on a marble slab. My first dissection. Opposite me stood a Christian girl, also a medical student. We both took very deep breaths in spite of the slight odor, and our eyes were wide and staring. I touched the cold skin covering the body and drew back my hand, gripping my scalpel more firmly. I looked at my partner’s frightened brown eyes. ‘D’you want to have a go first?’ I asked unchivalrously. ‘No, you first,’ she breathed. Yet within two weeks it was all old hat. We could even… joke about matters which would make other people’s hair stand on end.”

Here, John White describes how, as a medical student, he was quickly desensitized.

What happens to us is that we become desensitized like John White. It’s not a fault thing really. It’s a natural human reaction. Perhaps it is the way our bodies and minds are made in order to protect us.

It happens in marriages, relationships, at work, with our hobbies, the shows and music we like. The honeymoon ends and the first spark dies. We get bored and want to liven things up a bit.

How long have you been going to church? 5 years, since birth, I was recently converted, for 80 years, all my life.

This happens to our faith as well. People complain. I’m not getting anything out of church. There is nothing new. I don’t feel anything. We don’t have the spirit here. I’m numb.

It’s really pretty sad to hear this. It’s especially sad when you’re in love. If you and I are in love with Christ, if we come every Sunday to worship Him, then the focus of our questions and longings is really wrong. It is not what I am getting. The question we should ask ourselves is, “What am I giving?”

John Piper in his book “Desiring God” captures this by saying “If you come to God dutifully offering him the reward of your fellowship instead of thirsting after the reward of his fellowship, then you exalt yourself above God as his benefactor and belittle him as a needy beneficiary – and that is evil.”

The PNCC is a catholic church. It’s not only our heritage but it is our faith. Salvation comes through the transformation of the person by their commitment and faith in Jesus Christ, their willingness to live as Christians with all that goes along with that commitment, and all of this made real, present, and alive through our central, primary, and renewing focus being the Holy Mass and the sacraments.

We are entrusted with preaching the Word of God. Our church believes that the proclamation and preaching of the Word of God is a sacrament. You and I are all entrusted with this and have an equally important mission. Our mission involves:

  • Living and preaching Christ – if you want personal and church renewal this is what you must do – what you must give.
  • Exercising your faith – primarily through Holy Mass and the sacraments – and not just on Sunday, and also through prayer. By this exercise you will be strengthened and renewed.
  • Drawing others to Christ and the Church – through your actions, words, and life. At home, at work, everywhere.
  • No compromise – in your faith in Jesus Christ, who is the only begotten son of the Father, who is co-eternal, who was born, lived, was crucified, died, was buried, and who rose from the dead. And… no compromise in the morality taught by the Church. No backsliding, no it’s OK.

If we ask the right question, if our goal is the worship of God and His son Jesus Christ, if we fully accept and take up our cross and our mission, then we won’t have time to be desensitized but will be renewed daily. As Peter C. Moore, says in his book “Disarming the Secular Gods” “. . . the ultimate judgment of love apparently sets people free to be go-givers rather than go-getters.”

Perspective

Swiatowid or Jesus Christ

We are people of the modern world – the technological age. Nothing in the world or in space is unconquerable. There is no limit to our abilities or possibilities. Even human life is in our control.

Swiatowid was an ancient Slavic god. For many reasons this ancient god is applicable to today – perhaps more applicable than he was to the people of the ‘fields’ the Polonians of 1,039 years ago.

Swiatowid was not the greatest god in the pantheon of Slavic gods and goddesses. Studies have shown that the Polonians did not even worship stone gods, but were deists – believing that the gods were represented in every aspect of the world: people, trees, animals, and nature. It is thought that Swiatowid was created in response to the Christianization that occurred beginning a little before the baptism of Mieszko I in 966. The pagan believers needed a representation of a god that was bigger, better, and stronger than the Christian God.

Who was Swiatowid? Literally he was the god that sees the whole world. Swiatowid had four faces, two male and two female. The four faces on a stone column looked to the four directions, north, south, east and west. He saw it all and was, to his believers, all knowing and all powerful.

The modern age has adopted this ancient Slavic god as its standard-bearer. In today’s world it is easy to know and see all, even to be all. We live in the age of globalization and globalism.

We have the conveniences of the Internet, modern communication systems, mobile and satellite phones. We can be in touch with the news and events of distant places. Modern transportation has bridged the gap. In a few hours we can be in Europe, Asia, or the Near East. We can go to the store and buy cookies from Poland, vodka from Finland, art from Africa, technology from Asia. Even space flight can be made available to the average person.

All of this pales in comparison to the high level technological and medical advances that are to come. Among the advances we easily recognize are nanotechnology, cloning, stem-cell research, organ transplant and replacement, and the use of living cells as containers for vast amounts of data. Science offers us choices without conditions. I can choose who may live, for how long, and then I can choose when to die.

Two or three generations ago our immigrant grandparents and great-grandparents kissed their families goodbye. The opportunity to see them again or even to communicate effectively was slim. A young woman leaving her rural village may have been saying her final goodbye to her parents. Today we live in a society where there is rarely a final goodbye. We can go back and forth as we see fit. Distance, cost, and time are of little concern.

Have we become the children of Swiatowid? This idea should be a cause for reflection and personal concern. Each of us takes advantage of the conveniences of modern life. No one wants to go back to a time that did not offer the benefits we enjoy. This is a false nostalgia. We all want the pill to keep our cholesterol low and our blood pressure down. We would rather spend time with our children and grandchildren then wash clothes by hand or shovel coal into a furnace. We do appreciate what we have – although we forget to be thankful on occasion. Maybe we loose perspective.

Our perspective is the key fact – the essential element. Do we throw ourselves at the feet of Swiatowid or do we call upon the man on the cross? What is my choice?

On Good Friday we Catholics kiss the cross of Jesus. Some of us kiss each of His wounds – His head, hands, feet, and side, a beautiful act of tenderness and compassion. This is an action that we need to repeat daily – an action of love. Regardless of our amassing unlimited power – we cannot truly love; we cannot truly live, without setting the world aside – setting Swiatowid aside for Jesus.

We can see the world and experience it – but we cannot know the world without looking through the lens of Christian faith. It is possible to accept everything our minds and hands create. However, an acceptance of everything without judgment is an illusion. Jesus showed us a life that was based on the two greatest commandments – love of God and love of neighbor. A world without these uniquely Christian elements will lead us to death.

Yes, Swiatowid is more applicable today if we set aside Christ and choose him. If we choose to worship a god of stone – a god out of our own hands – we will miss the redemption that is universal and eternal. This is the redemption offered to us through our repentance and faith, and as the founder of the PNCC stated, in our becoming regenerated.

Jesus was not a creation in response to outside influences. Jesus in fact is God, co-eternal with the Father and the Holy Spirit. The entire Old Testament was a progression from creation to Jesus. Like Advent, it was a preparation time. The Old Testament revealed Him albeit indirectly, pointed to Him, prophesied about Him, and was fulfilled by His coming. Twelve days after Christmas we celebrate the Feast of the Epiphany, which is God’s revelation to the nations in the form of the Three Kings. Jesus is God’s revelation to humanity and every revelation throughout history is done in the person of Jesus, the Son.

There are of course many examples of the Lord speaking and interacting with men and women in the Old Testament, of the pre-figuring of Jesus as the Passover Lamb, and in the words and prophesies of Isaiah which are especially clear to us.

This revelation is more than a man named Jesus who lived 2,005 years ago. Jesus did not begin and end in a span of 33 years. He is eternal and His message, His word, His way of life, His Spirit – the Holy Spirit is present, available, and completely applicable today.

Jesus and Swiatowid are choices. Jesus does not exclude or reject the world – for He moved upon the world as it was created, as the voice of the Father. It is really about choice. Jesus for the sake of my salvation and the salvation of the world or Swiatowid for the sake of the world alone. As for me and my family we choose Jesus.

Perspective, PNCC,

Welcome

Hello and welcome. I am a Catholic deacon. I grew up as a Roman Catholic, studied in a R.C. seminary for the priesthood, and eventually reached a point where I found the R.C. church to no longer be relevant or enriching to me. I based this decision on the vast changes in the Church that left it “protestantized” and inconsistent with the apostolic and Orthodox faith I once knew. This path of discovery is my personal faith journey.

I was searching for a church that proclaimed the word of God, was apostolic, had the seven sacraments, valid orders, a focus on the Eucharist – proclaiming the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist, had traditional devotional opportunities, and was not intrusive into issues best left between a husband and wife. I found it in the PNCC, the Polish National Catholic Church. If you don’t know too much about the PNCC, I recommend that you check out the PNCC website. The Church has a very interesting history and a very relevant faith, especially for those who do not adhere to the idea of rules and regulations in non-essentials as established by the Roman Catholic Church.

Using this blog I will post my personal thoughts, share homily ideas, and perspectives on the ‘church’ today.

I do not speak on behalf of the PNCC. I do however have a voice in my church. This is something we all share as members of the PNCC. Everyone has a voice and a vote – even in electing candidates for Bishop!

I welcome you and hope you find something meaningful from my posts. If you do, it’s not because of me, but because of the power of the Holy Spirit in your life. I wish you all the best and pray that every blessing be yours.